Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Woodry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

On October 30, 1934, plaintiff purchased a heating stove at the agreed price of $8.50. At that time plaintiff signed a conditional sales contract, in the body of which F. N. Woodry is named as the seller, but which was signed by D. E. Woodry as seller. Plaintiff issued two checks to defendant, F. N. Woodry, in the sum of $4.25 each. On November 14,1934, one of these checks was paid. The other check bears the superscription, “Hold till Dec. 3. ” On January 15,1935, defendant, F. N. Woodry, tendered it for deposit, but on the following day, in the process of clearing, the bank, upon which it…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Maisenbacker v. Society ConcordiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. State v. OgdenOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Street v. SinclairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Borland v. BarrettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  5. Lonergan v. William Small & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. BornholdtNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Westerman v. Oregon Automobile Credit Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Williams v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Phelan v. BeswickOregon Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API