Legal Opinion
In Re White-Steiner
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 2009No. SB-08-0119-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
198 P.3d 1195 (2009)
In the Matter of a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Janet L. WHITE-STEINER, Attorney No. 14295, Respondent.
No. SB-08-0119-D.
Supreme Court of Arizona, In Division.
January 8, 2009.
Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C. by J. Scott Rhodes, Phoenix, Attorneys for Janet L. White-Steiner.
State Bar of Arizona by Patricia J. Ramirez, Phoenix, Attorney for the State Bar of Arizona.
OPINION
BALES, Justice.
¶ 1 In reviewing attorney discipline cases, the Disciplinary Commission must accept a hearing officer's factual findings if they have any reasonable basis. Because the Commission here…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re SchollArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Non-Member of State Bar, Van DoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re WalkerArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re ToccoArizona Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re AbramsArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Member of State BarArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Hodge - (Supreme Court of Kansas · 2017