Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1989No. D.D. 88-13Published

1Opinion of the Court

On November 16, 1988, Timothy Joseph O’Neill was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.1 He was ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings totalling $992.37.

O’Neill moves the court for permission to pay the costs in installments of $50 per month after an initial payment of $150. This motion is granted.

An application for reinstatement to the practice of law filed by O’Neill will not be considered until all costs are paid in full.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

See Disciplinary Counsel v. O’Neill (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 337, 530 N.E. 2d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API