Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Mayher

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bowie. Tried below before Hon. P. A. Turner.

1Opinion of the Court

TALBOT, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted to recover upon a liquor dealer’s bond. The breaches alleged are, that appellee Mayher permitted appellant’s minor son to enter and remain in his place of business on two different occasions, and allowed him to play prohibited games of pool therein. The petition alleged that Mayher had procured a license authorizing him to engage in and pursue the occupation of a retail liquor dealer at 108 Broad Street, in the city of Texarkana, Texas. The bond given for that purpose, and upon which appellant’s cause of action is based, was copied in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schloss v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Johnson v. RollsTexas Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Loving v. HazelwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. City of Woodburn v. AplinOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Trussed Concrete Steel Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Hunt Oil Company v. KillionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Taggart v. HillmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API