Legal Opinion

Taggart v. Hillman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bowie County. Tried below before Hon. P. A. Turner.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

This is a suit on a liquor dealer’s bond executed by H. J. Taggart, as principal, and the American Bonding Company, as surety. The allegations in the petition are, in effect, that appellant Taggart, sold intoxicants to Jack Hillman, the minor son of appellee, and permitted said Jack Hillman to enter and remain in appellant’s place of business. A trial and judgment resulted in favor of plaintiff against the defendants on the bond, from which the defendants appeal.

The sufficiency of evidence to sustain the judgment is not questioned, and we conclude that the allegations of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark, Sheriff v. Finley, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Johnson v. Martin, Wise & FitzhughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Snyder v. ComptonTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hillman v. MayherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Memphis Cotton Oil Co. v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. City of Woodburn v. AplinOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Winkie v. ConatserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API