Legal Opinion

Hoover v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 29, 2003No. CR 02-1150PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

Robert A. Hoover appeals his convictions and sentences of life without parole and life for capital murder and aggravated robbery. Hoover asserts first that the trial court erred in allowing the State to amend the felony information in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 16-85-407 (1987), and in violation of the trial court’s omnibus order. We hold that Hoover fails to show he suffered any prejudice by the amended felony information. Hoover also asserts the trial court erred in refusing to excuse prospective jurors for cause who indicated they would not consider self-intoxication…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Berna v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Bowen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Underwood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Terry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Vanoven v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Hoyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API