Legal Opinion

Hoyle v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 8, 2011No. CR 09-445PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

| following his conviction on two counts of manslaughter and one count of first-degree battery, appellant Eric Keith Hoyle sought relief under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2011). The trial court denied his Rule 37.1 petition, and appellant has lodged an appeal in this court. Because the denial of postconviction relief was not clear error, we affirm.

After a jury trial, appellant received sentences of 120 months’ imprisonment on each of the manslaughter counts and 240 months’ imprisonment on the battery charge, for an aggregate term of 480 months’ imprisonment. This court affirmed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Polivka v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Lacy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Lazaro Veneros-Figueroa v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  4. Cuningham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Reynolds v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API