Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 13, 2008No. 65 Sept.Term, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRELL, Judge.

I

Carl Eugene Jones, Jr. (Petitioner) asks us to determine whether his day-of-trial request for a postponement to secure counsel and continue review of discovery responses was denied properly. In urging us to conclude it was not, he relies on two grounds. The first is that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion in denying Jones counsel, where, after a concededly knowing and voluntary initial waiver of counsel, Jones effectively elected to withdraw his waiver and requested coun sel before trial began. Second, Jones complains that, as of the day of trial, he had not…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Letke Security Contractors, Inc. v. United States Surety Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API