Armstrong v. Chisolm
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, James Armstrong, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, partly in favor of the plaintiff and partly in favor of the defendant Talbot, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 4th day of March, 1904, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, as adjudges that the plaintiff has failed to establish any lien or right to a lien upon the real property described in the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Patterson, J.:
This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. It was decided at the Special Term upon an agreed statement of facts,, from which it appears that the defendant Mary Chisolm was the owner of the premises against which the lien was filed. She contracted with Andrew J. Robinson, doing business under the name of Robinson & Wallace, for the performance of certain work and furnishing of certain materials and there was due from her to Robinson & Wallace the sum of $12,805, with interest. The plaintiff Armstrong had a contract with Robinson and there was duel the plaintiff upon that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradley & Currier Co. v. PacheteauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- New Jersey Steel & Iron Co. v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- New Jersey Steel and Iron Company v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re James Passero & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Hurley v. TuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Mawson-Peterson Lumber Co. v. SprinkleWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Godfrey Lumber Co. v. KlineMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Sprickerhoff v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.