Bradley & Currier Co. v. Pacheteau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Jacques Pacheteau, from a judgment •of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 11th day of November, 1901, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, foreclosing a mechanic’s lien.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff had a judgment establishing the lien and directing a sale of the premises described in the complaint, from which defendant has appealed. He attacks the judgment principally upon the ground that the notice filed did not comply with the statute and for that reason was insufficient to create a lien., The statute (Laws of 1897, chap. 418 § 9) provides that the notice filed shall state the name and residence of the lienor; the name of the owner of the real property against whose interest a lien is claimed; the name of the person…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Abbott v. . EastonNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Finn v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- New Jersey Steel & Iron Co. v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Armstrong v. ChisolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Fyfe v. . Sound Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.