Naumovski v. Norris
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
José A. Cabranes, Circuit Judge:
*207 We consider here whether the termination of an employee, allegedly in response to malicious rumors of sexual misconduct, can support claims for sex discrimination. In principle, such claims may well be viable, particularly under the broad statutory cause of action provided by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"). The claims before us on appeal, however, were brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The standards for such claims, particularly with respect to vicarious liability and…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Buon v. SpindlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Bart v. Golub Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- Linton v. ZornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
- Vasquez v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Adams-Flores v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.