Legal Opinion

City of Wichita v. Hull

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 11, 1986No. 58,713PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Briscoe, J.:

This is a direct appeal by the defendant, Darrell D. Hull, from his conviction of driving while under the influence of drugs in violation of Wichita City Ordinance § 11.38.150(b). Defendant specifically raises two issues and discusses a third: (1) Whether intent is a necessary element of driving while under the influence of drugs or alcohol; (2) whether he can be convicted of driving while under the influence when his conduct was involuntary; and (3) whether there was sufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction where no expert testimony was introduced to show defendant’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. People v. RostadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. State v. PhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Lacquement v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  5. State v. SeelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HammondSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. State v. BealorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. State v. MountjoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. State v. JC Sports Bar, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API