City of Wichita v. Hull
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Briscoe, J.:
This is a direct appeal by the defendant, Darrell D. Hull, from his conviction of driving while under the influence of drugs in violation of Wichita City Ordinance § 11.38.150(b). Defendant specifically raises two issues and discusses a third: (1) Whether intent is a necessary element of driving while under the influence of drugs or alcohol; (2) whether he can be convicted of driving while under the influence when his conduct was involuntary; and (3) whether there was sufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction where no expert testimony was introduced to show defendant’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- People v. RostadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- State v. PhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Lacquement v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- State v. SeelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. BealorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- State v. MountjoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. JC Sports Bar, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.