Legal Opinion
Banning v. Brown
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 19, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Original Proceeding in Contempt.
1Opinion of the CourtBrowne, C. J.
On January 4th, 1917, a rule nisi was issued by this court on the petition of E. P. Banning and others, against W. A. Daniel, to show cause why he should not be adjudged in contempt for disregarding a supersedeas obtained upon the appeal herein.
On January nth, 1917, W. A. Daniel filed his answer, and the petitioner moved to make the rule nisi absolute.
Statement
On the 24th of November, 1916, a final decree of foreclosure was entered in the Circuit Court of Duval County against E. P. Banning, Anna Mae Banning and Andrew, Bysheim, and W. A. Daniel was appointed Special Master in Chancery to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. Mason v. Harper's Ferry Bridge Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
- Dickerson v. Tishomingo CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
- Continental National Building & Loan Ass'n v. G. S ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
- State ex rel. Heckel v. KleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Crichlow v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Mailman Development Corp. v. SegallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Martorano v. RoblesSupreme Court of Florida · 1933