Legal Opinion

Mailman Development Corp. v. Segall

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 23, 1981No. 81-904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner seeks review by certiorari of the trial court’s order entered subsequent to this court’s order staying all further proceedings in the trial court.

Petitioner/mortgagee is foreclosing a mortgage against the respondent/mortgagor. Prior to trial, petitioner/mortgagee sought review by certiorari of a discovery order entered by the trial court. This court, upon the filing of the petition, entered a stay order prohibiting further proceedings in the trial court.

Thereafter, the respondent/mortgagor moved in the trial court for the substitution of the security interest in the real…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. Seaboard All-Fla. Ry. Co. v. Levitt, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Sunrise Beach, Inc. v. PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Griffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. White v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zipperer v. City of Fort MyersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Zipperer v. City of Fort MyersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  3. City of Panama City v. Head ex rel. HeadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. & SC14-1618 Florida Bankers Association v. Florida Development Finance Corporation, etc. & Robert Reynolds v. Florida Development Finance Corporation, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2015
  5. Beach Community Bank v. SpellmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API