Legal Opinion

Stricklin v. L. N.R.R. Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 29, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No petition for Certiorari was filed.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for the demolition of plaintiff's automobile caused by a collision with the defendant's freight train. At the close of all the evidence the trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff in error moved for a new trial, which was overruled. He has appealed in error to this court and has assigned errors.

The judgment was entered on April 22, 1925, and the court allowed plaintiff in error sixty days in which to execute an appeal bond and to file a bill of exceptions. The appeal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Todd v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Powers v. McKenzieTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Middle Tennessee R. v. McMillanTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Chattanooga Ry. & Light Co. v. BettisTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nashville Gas & Heating Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  2. Tennessee United Paint Store, Inc. v. D. H. Overmyer Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  3. Belcher v. Tennessee Central Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. BrymerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  5. Illinois Cent. R. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API