Legal Opinion

Illinois Cent. R. v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1929No. 5115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff recovered damages for the killing of her husband, Louis Davis, by defendant’s train at a public road crossing 237 rods south of the corporate limits of the town of Trimble, Tenn. The train was approaching the town from the south. The question on which the case turns here is whether subsection 3 of section 1574 of the Statutes of Tennessee applies. If it does, the judgment must be affirmed; if it does not, there should'have been a directed verdict for the defendant. The statute reads: “On approaching a city or town, the bell or whistle shall be sounded when the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Stricklin v. L. N.R.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Belcher v. Tennessee Central Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API