Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mathews

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1985No. 00823, 00824PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH,

President Judge:

These are consolidated appeals by the Commonwealth from orders arresting judgment. Although the jury rejected appellees’ arguments that they had been entrapped, see 18 Pa.C.S. § 313, and found them guilty of attempt to manufacture a controlled substance, the trial court, on post-verdict motions, arrested judgment because it found that the police conduct in this case was so outrageous that appellees were denied due process. We affirm.

Even where entrapment is not proved, police involvement in criminal activity may be so outrageous that a prosecution will be barred on due…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Billy W. Gray, Lee Andrew Fennell, Roger Lee Wright, Ronald Cecil Barker and Vance C. DyarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Gary Anthony Gianni, Joseph Mike Giardina, Richard Loren Holland, James Robert HamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. AgrabanteHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. BoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. NelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. DelligattiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API