Legal Opinion
Florence v. Frank
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 16, 1991No. CA3-90-0310-GPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FISH, District Judge.
After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge regarding defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment are correct and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted.
SIGNED AND ENTERED.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Emrick v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
- Eckles v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
- Florence v. RunyonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
- Thornton v. Neiman MarcusDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1994
- Suttles v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.