Legal Opinion
United States v. William C. Austin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 20, 1987No. 86-1216, 86-2395PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
Austin appeals the district court’s partial denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed May 13, 1986, and the court’s June 9, 1986 resentencing. Austin has offered no reason why the resentencing should be reversed, and we find none. We now turn our focus to his § 2255 motion. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
In 1979, while employed as a crane operator, the appellant injured his back. From August 1979 until February of 1983, he received disability payments from the government. In 1981 and again in 1982, Austin received a letter from the Department of Labor,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Gerald M. Schaflander, United States of America v. Stephen M. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Vernon C. Weygandt v. Kenneth DucharmeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Charles E. Hamilton, United States of America v. Charles Eugene HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Frank De RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Norman Russell Baker, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Wilson BigmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Susan Carol FITZGERALD, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Brumley v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1993
- United States v. MachiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997