Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilson Bigman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 18, 1990No. 88-1703PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Wilson Bigman appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Bigman pleaded guilty to second degree murder and received an eighteen year sentence. Bigman’s § 2255 motion challenged the effectiveness of counsel throughout his criminal proceedings. The district court summarily denied Bigman’s motion. We vacate the district court’s denial of Bigman’s § 2255 claim based upon a challenge to the voluntariness of his plea and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

I

We review de novo the denial of a § 2255 motion. Roth v. United States, 724 F.2d 836, 839…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Arthur Donnell Miller, Jr. v. Ron ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States of America, Ex Rel., and Michael E. Green v. Northrop Corporation Norm BussardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Gary William Minore, AKA Skip, United States of America v. Arthur Torsone, United States of America v. Prommateta ChinawatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Erwin Darrell NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API