Legal Opinion

Popelas v. Travelers Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County

Decided June 6, 2003No. 724 of 2003, G.DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

LESKINEN, J.,

Before this court is a petition to compel the appointment of an arbitrator filed by petitioner, John T. Pópelas III.

*221After full consideration of the record, applicable law, and briefs of counsel, this court finds that the parties in a dispute over underinsured motorists coverage (UIM) cannot be compelled to submit to arbitration, absent an agreement between the parties to arbitrate that issue. Therefore, this court denies petitioner’s petition to compel the appointment of an arbitrator.

BACKGROUND

On or about June 13,2002, petitioner was involved in a motor vehicle accident. At the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lincoln University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education v. Lincoln University Chapter of the American Ass'n of University ProfessorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Johnson v. Pennsylvania National Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. MuirCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Dearry v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. JOHNSON BY JOHNSON v. TravelersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API