Legal Opinion
Loyal Erectors, Inc. v. Hamilton & Son, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 4, 1973PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFRESNE, Chief Justice.
On July 7, 1971 the plaintiff, Loyal Erectors, Inc., initiated proceedings against the principal defendant, Hamilton & Son, Inc. (Hamilton), for the recovery of $40,301.58, plus interest, which the plaintiff asserts Hamilton owes it by virtue of certain contractual obligations. In the prosecution of its claim, the plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 4B, M.R.C.P., on July 15, 1971 served a trustee summons on Robert C. Ford, Inc. (Ford), requiring the latter to show cause through verified disclosure why execution issued upon such judgment as the plaintiff may recover against…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Gosselin v. Better Homes, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
- Hanley v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Krogman v. Rice Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Foisy v. BishopSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Northeast Investment Co. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- American Continental Life Insurance v. Ranier Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Northeast Drilling, Inc. v. Inner Space Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Lisi v. MarraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
- Dolan v. McQuaideCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.