Legal Opinion
Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Reimel
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 8, 1967No. Civ. 46228PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Injunction
PECKHAM, District Judge:
On December 30, 1966, in the District Court for the Northern District of California, a temporary restraining order was issued and a three-judge District Court was convened to hear plaintiff’s complaint for temporary and permanent injunctive relief under the provisions of sections 2281 and 2284 of Title 28, United States Code.
Plaintiff alleges in its verified complaint that its off-sale general liquor licenses, Numbers 21 3458 and 21 7309, were revoked in violation of its rights under the Due…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Francisco Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation v. Edward J. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Connelly Foundation v. School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Preston County Light & Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1969