Barnesville Bank v. Ingram
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. While the act of August 21, 1922, provides that “all crops, matured or unmatured, shall be and the same are hereby declared to be personalty,” this statute in terms declares that “nothing in this act shall be construed to permit levies on unmatured crops, but such levies and sales are expressly forbidden except as is now provided by law.” 6a. L. 1922, pp. 114, 115. Thus, as restricted by the provisions of section 6030 of the Civil Code of 1910, “immature crops can *270not be levied on separately from the land on which they are growing, except where the debtor absconds or removes from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bagley v. Columbus Southern Rwy. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Almand v. Scott & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Souter v. CravyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Scott, Horton & Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.