Legal Opinion

Benedict v. Farlow

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1891No. 40PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

Upon the authority of City of Hammond v. New York, etc., R. W. Co., 126 Ind. 597, we assume jurisdiction in this case, notwithstanding the fact that one of the judges is disqualified to sit therein on account of his former connection with the same as counsel.

Error is alleged by the appellant in the overruling of the demurrer to the second paragraph of the answer, and in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*161The action is brought by the appellants against the appellee for the recovery of personal property upon which the appellants claim to hold a chattel mortgage. The answer is in two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hosford v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. First National Bank of Cambridge City v. ColterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Eichbredt v. AngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Wilcox v. MoudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bunn v. WalchWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Masoner v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Hilligoss v. ThorpeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Scotti v. MayslesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Duncan v. KimbrelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API