Legal Opinion

Blackowiak v. Kemp

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1996No. C3-94-2013PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

The singular issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly entered summary judgment of dismissal of the plaintiff Mark Blackowiak’s complaint to recover damages for alleged sexual abuse by the defendant Richard Kemp on the basis that the plaintiff knew or had reason to know that he sustained personal injury caused by sexual abuse prior to August 8, 1986 and that the action was barred by application of the 6-year limitations period of Minn.Stat. § 541.073, subd. 2(a) (1992). The court of appeals reversed, holding that the evidence did not conclusively establish that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Hare v. WendlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. W.J.L. v. BuggeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Nolde v. FrankieArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API