Legal Opinion

Sally Conforte v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1993No. 91-16713PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

With tax liabilities of over $17 million, Sally Conforte has brought this action in an effort to get a $15 million credit against these liabilities, asserted by her to be the going concern value of her brothel, now levied upon and sold by the United States. Her effort to litigate her tax liabilities in this fashion fails. We dismiss those causes of action of which the district court had no jurisdiction. We affirm summary judgment against Conforte as to those causes of action over which the district court had jurisdiction.

BACKGROUND

Conforte was the owner with her husband…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Louie N. Elias v. W.H. ConnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Lindsey v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Turner v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  4. Sanchez v. Pacific Powder Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. White v. CommissionerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API