Legal Opinion

University of Pittsburgh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1994No. 433 C.D. 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The University of Pittsburgh (Employer) appeals from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the referee’s decision setting aside the final receipt signed by Frederick Johnson (Claimant) and granting compensation for the period of May 31, 1988 to March 19, 1992. On appeal, Employer claims that there is insufficient evidence to support the Board’s finding that Claimant met his burden of proof for setting aside a final receipt, or, alternatively, that Employer was entitled to credit for income earned by Claimant during this period.

The facts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Investors Diversified Services & Travelers Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Howar) (Hoar)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Jeanes Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Mauger & Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Deichler v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capuano v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. ANR Freight System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Weissman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Trimmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API