Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1922No. 3639PublishedCited by 41 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee; J. W. Ross, Judge. Mrs. Bessie Reynolds was convicted of offenses, and she brings error.

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error was convicted upon each of two counts of an indictment under the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305); the first count charging the unlawful manufacture and possession of intoxicating liquors, and the second charging the possession of certain implements and materials designed for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors for unlawful use. The judgment covered conviction under both counts. The charges contained in the respective counts grow out of substantially the same transaction. In each the charge is 'laid as on or about May 25th.

[ 1 ] The testimony principally relied…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Ebeling v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Carter v. McClaughrySupreme Court of the United States · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  2. People v. ClemettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Levin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  4. Koth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  5. Schroeder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API