Legal Opinion
Dinicola v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 31, 2016No. 08C23184; A150967PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.
Plaintiff appeals the judgment dismissing his complaint alleging that defendants State of Oregon and Oregon University System (OUS) violated federal and state statutes by retaliating against plaintiff because he had previously filed overtime wage claims against the state. Dinicola v. State of Oregon, 246 Or App 526, 268 P3d 632, rev den, 352 Or 377 (2011), cert den,_US_, 134 S Ct 724 (2012).1 The main issue on appeal is whether our holding in Dinicola, that plaintiff was not employed by the state, precludes plaintiff from relitigating that issue in this current proceeding. The state and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Seida, Jr. v. BaldwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Seida, Jr. v. BaldwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Smith v. SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2023