Legal Opinion

Handfinger v. Philadelphia Gas Works

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1970No. Appeal, No. 187PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ms. Justice Jones,

Faye Handfinger and her father initiated a trespass action against Philadelphia Gas Works and United Gas Improvement Company in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.1 After a nonjury trial which resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs, UGI filed alternative motions for judgment non obstante veredicto, for a new trial, or for a remittitur. The court en banc, the trial judge dissenting, set aside the verdict and entered judgment for the defendants n.o.v. The plaintiffs have appealed from the entry of that judgment.

On an appeal from the entry of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Austin v. RidgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Richette v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Cummings v. Nazareth BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Darlington v. General ElectricSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. CropperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API