Harbin v. Harbin
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Mrs. Iciedoe Harbin sued John Harbin for a divorce, alleging cruelty and adultery. The appeal is by the defendant from a decree granting the plaintiff the divorce and awarding her alimony and the custody of the couple’s two children.
The point argued — and to which we will confine discussion (Supreme Court Rules 10 and 12, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix; Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Holland, 173 Ala. 675, 55 So. 1001; Wetzel v. Hobbs, Ala.Sup., 31 So.2d 639 1 — is that the evidence was insufficient to rest a divorce decree on either ground. We think the argument is well founded.
Bo…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Harrison v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Wetzel v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870
- Tillery v. TillerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Linderman v. LindermanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Hendrix v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.