Legal Opinion

Harbin v. Harbin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 30, 1947No. 6 Div. 581PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Mrs. Iciedoe Harbin sued John Harbin for a divorce, alleging cruelty and adultery. The appeal is by the defendant from a decree granting the plaintiff the divorce and awarding her alimony and the custody of the couple’s two children.

The point argued — and to which we will confine discussion (Supreme Court Rules 10 and 12, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix; Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Holland, 173 Ala. 675, 55 So. 1001; Wetzel v. Hobbs, Ala.Sup., 31 So.2d 639 1 — is that the evidence was insufficient to rest a divorce decree on either ground. We think the argument is well founded.

Bo…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Harrison v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Wetzel v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870
  5. Tillery v. TillerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Linderman v. LindermanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  2. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Hendrix v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API