Legal Opinion

In Re Appropriation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1958No. 2460PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict wherein the jury fixed the compensation of appellees for the land taken by appropriation for highway purposes — “exclusive of structure situated wholly upon the land appropriated, $27,890; damage to residue, $1,710 and value of structure, $100, total of $29,700.”

The resolution and finding of the Director of Highways describes five parcels of land and interests therein to be taken. Parcel No, 20-LA (highway), perpetual easement for limited access highway purposes, containing 2.575 acres, more or less; parcel No. 20-A-SL (slope), the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. v. MasonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Boyer v. MaloneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Muccino v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Robert v. . KidanskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Werner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API