Gemco Engineering & Mfg. Co. v. Henderson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This court is in agreement with the Court of Appeals in finding, under the evidence, that Henderson was not employed by Gemco to invent, and that he is the owner of the inventions of both the mounter and demounter, subject to any assignment or assignments thereof which Henderson may have theretofore made. In fact, counsel for Gemco now apparently concede that such finding is warranted by the evidence.
However, Henderson maintains that the Court of Appeals erred in that part of its decree, which gave Gemco a nonexclusive shop right to use, manufacture and sell both inventions. Henderson claims…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Gill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Banner Metals, Inc. v. LockwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bandag, Incorporated v. MoreningsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966