Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 10, 1986PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

This case arises out of the defendant’s refusal to pay under the plaintiff’s own policy for medical expenses incurred by him while operating a motor vehicle owned and insured by his spouse. A judge of the Superior Court reported the case to the Appeals Court in accordance with Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure 64, 365 Mass. 831 (1974), and we allowed Thomas’s application for direct appellate review.

The following facts were stipulated by the parties. The plaintiff was insured by the defendant, The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford), under a Massachusetts motor vehicle…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Royal-Globe Insurance v. SchultzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rci Northeast Services Division v. Boston Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. Somerset Savings Bank v. Chicago Title InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Allstate Insurance v. Quinn Construction Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
  4. Commerce Insurance v. KochMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  5. Johnson v. Hanover InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API