Legal Opinion

Brigham v. Gurney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Oakland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court,

Wing, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought by Gurney, before a justice of the peace, upon a promissory note, bearing date Feb. ll, 1844, made payable to William C. Brownell or bearer, for $65, with use, for value received, on or before the first day of.January next. The suit was commenced on the 30th June, 1846. The declaration was in the common form, in which the plaintiff as bearer of the note alleges the note wras transferred to him.

The defendants plead the general issue, and gave notice that the note was obtained by fraud and deception, and further, that the note is not *350t…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gage v. KendallNew York Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rondot v. Rogers Tp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  2. Moore v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Lobdell v. Merchants' & Manufacturers' BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Paine v. First Division of St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  5. Watkins v. PlummerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API