Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1882PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Superior Com! of Detroit. AssuMPsrr. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The action in this case is upon a promissory note made by Hall & Parent payable to the order of Samuel Moore. On the back of it was the name of Samuel Louden, and Louden was made defendant as joint maker; his name having been placed upon the note before it was endorsed by the payee.

The note was sued by John A. Moore, who produced it. on the trial with the endorsement of the payee upon it. Respecting the plaintiff’s right to sue the following evidence was given by him : Samuel Moore, the payee, was his father. Shortly before the note became due, his father-endorsed the note and delivered it to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyd v. CorbittMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Brigham v. GurneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Catlin v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Einfeld v. ShermerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Citizens State Bank v. E. A. Tessman & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Crawford v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Brazfield v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API