Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Plummer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Jackson. (Person, J., presiding.) Assumpsit. Defendant' brings error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

Tbe defendant is sued as indorser upon a negotiable promissory note. Tbe plaintiff lives in Jackson county, and brought tbe action in tbe circuit court of that county, and recovered a judgment. Tbe defendant lives in Saginaw county, but has business interests in Jackson county which call bim there at times. It was shown at tbe trial that tbe note in suit was discounted at tbe People's Bank in Manchester, Washtenaw county, by tbe defendant, and that tbe bank was, at tbe time of tbe institution of tbe suit, and at tbe time of the trial, tbe owner of tbe note, but bad transferred tbe same for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids, Newaygo & Lake Shore Railroad v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Brigham v. GurneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steel v. Clinton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hicks v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API