RAJ Acquisition Corp. v. Atamanuk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about November 15, 1999, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, canceled the notice of pendency, and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this action for specific performance and damages for the alleged breach of a contract to purchase real property, the motion court properly found that the purported letter agreement was void pursuant to the Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law § 5-703 [2]) since it failed to state all the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anostario v. VicinanzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- O'Brien v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Shui Ching Chan v. Bay Ridge Park Hill Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Cooper v. SchubeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Cooper v. SchubeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Yenom Corp. v. 155 Wooster Street Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Checkla v. Stone Meadow Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Yenom Corp. v. 155 Wooster Street Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Nassau Beekman LLC v. Ann/Nassau Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ross v. WuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.