Kroger Co. v. Cook
Ohio Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceTroop, J.
Reference is to the decision of Duffey, P. J., for the basic facts necessary to this decision.
Counsel for the appellant suggest that the outcome of this case will encompass a broad sweep and “will determine the legality or illegality of all promotional give-away games in the state of Ohio.” However enticing such a suggestion might be, counsel must be reminded that the case on for review by this court involves a clearly-defined and limited question concerning the “promotional” games “Race to Riches” and “Pepsi-Cola Bottle Cap Promotion,” as found upon the premises and operated through the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Zugravu v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Neil House Hotel Co. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Solomon v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Coady v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Troy Amusement Co. v. AttenweilerOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.