Legal Opinion

Madajewski v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1939No. Appeal, 3PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The appellant’s chief contention in this case is that the award made by the compensation authorities, and approved by the court, for disfigurement under section 306(c) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended May 20, 1921, P. L. 966 (77 PS §513), is not supported by competent evidence.

Claimant, while in the course of his employment on August 2,1934, sustained an injury to his right eye and burns on the back of his head and neck. An agreement was entered into August 15, 1934, under which compensation was paid for the eye injury from August…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muchnick v. Susquehanna Waist Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Walsh v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Helitski v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Yaklich v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Pavik v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Moran v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Phillips v. Coxe Brothers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API