Legal Opinion

Muchnick v. Susquehanna Waist Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1936No. Appeal, 334PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The claimant, while in the course of her employment with' the Susquehanna Waist Company, met with an accident which resulted in the loss of two teeth in the upper jaw, the left lateral incisor and the left first bicuspid, and a chipping of the left central incisor. She lost no time from her employment as a result of the injuries, but made claim under §306 (c) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act for disfigurement, which claim was not allowed by the referee. That official found the injuries to the teeth .to be as alleged, and as the sixth finding of fact found that “the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slemba v. Hamilton & SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Simon v. Maryland Battery Service Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Walsh v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. Sanford Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Yaklich v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. PizzoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Lako v. SCHLESSINGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Pavik v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API