Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Brown-Perry

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2003No. 00-3048-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. This case is before us under SCR 22.14(2)1 and SCR 22.17(2)2 on a stipulation between the parties, Attorney Lauren R. Brown-Perry, and the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR). The stipulation consists of her no contest plea to the allegations of misconduct in the OLR complaint. The referee, David R. Friedman, has issued a report based upon this stipulation.

¶ 2. We accept the stipulation and the referee's report and determine that the seriousness of Attorney Brown-Perry's misconduct warrants the imposition of the recommended retroactive one-year suspension.

¶ 3. Attorney Brown-Perry was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RoggensackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against WashingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jelinske (In Re Jelinske)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thad W. JelinskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API