Legal Opinion

Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hicks

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2004No. 02-2197-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the recommendation of the referee, Amy Gentz, that Attorney Leo Barron Hicks receive a public reprimand for professional misconduct consisting of failing to hold a client's property in trust, separate from the lawyer's own property; failing to take remedial action when a lawyer knows of misconduct by another lawyer in the firm; and failing to treat property in which both the lawyer and another person claim interests as trust property until there has been an accounting and severance of their interests. The referee also recommends that Attorney Hicks be required to pay the costs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Brown-PerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lizbeth Hernandez Ramirez v. Voyager Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API