Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jelinske (In Re Jelinske)

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2018No. 2016AP001897-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1 We review the report and recommendation of Referee Jonathan V. Goodman, which approves a stipulation between Attorney Thad W. Jelinske and the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) by which Attorney Jelinske pled no contest to 15 of the 23 allegations of misconduct in the OLR's complaint. Consistent with the parties' stipulation, the referee recommended that this court suspend Attorney Jelinske's Wisconsin law license for 18 months, retroactive to October 16, 2017. The referee further recommended that Attorney Jelinske be assessed the full costs of the proceeding, which are $13,032.92 as of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re Law Examination of 1926Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Sands v. Menard, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James M. SchoeneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael M. KrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl Robert ScholzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thad W. JelinskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API