Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Ala. v. Caudle
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.
Caudle sued Blue Cross-Blue Shield (Blue Cross) claiming benefits under a hospital policy. Judgment was for plaintiff. Blue Cross appeals. We reverse.
The dispositive issue is whether an applicant for an insurance policy with coverage conditioned upon payment of the initial premium within thirty days thereof is entitled to credit for the premium from benefits accruing from a claim arising during said thirty days.
Pertinent facts are: Caudle was an insured under a Blue Cross group policy until March 24, 1976. The group policy provided that upon termination of employment,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cherokee Life Ins, Co. v. BrannumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Royal Ins. Co. v. EgglestonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- State v. Tri-State PharmaceuticalCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Reliance Life Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. LowrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- W. Va. Public Employees Insurance Board v. Blue Cross Hospital Service Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- W. Va. Public Employees Insurance Board v. Blue Cross Hospital Service Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1985