Legal Opinion · Dissent

W. Va. Public Employees Insurance Board v. Blue Cross Hospital Service Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1985No. 16094Published

1DissentNeely, Chief Justice

I find that I must dissent to Part II of the majority opinion because the evidence indicates conclusively that the State, and not Blue Cross, cancelled the contract. The “grace period” that is provided in insurance contracts, and that is required by statute, is an “anti-lapse” provision designed to prevent insureds who are late in paying premiums from being without coverage. It has long been the rule in other jurisdictions, both federal and state, that a grace period: “Does not contemplate free insurance, or operate to continue the policy in force after it expires by agreement of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. the Travelers Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Interstate Fire Insurance Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963
  3. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Ala. v. CaudleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API