Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. McNamara

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1904No. Docket No. 17PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Van Burén; Carr, J. Bill by Lewis Rhoades against Ed. McNamara to enjoin the use of a roadway across complainant’s land. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Complainant gave to one Aaron Tail-man a license to construct a roadway across his land, and to draw over the same certain timber belonging to him. After this timber was drawn, defendant, who had been in Tallman’s employ-, contrary to the objections of complainant, drew over said roadway timber belonging to himself, and persisted in so using said roadway, notwithstanding the objections of complainant. This bill was filed for the purpose of procuring an injunction restraining said use, and compensation for the damage. Complainant obtained a decree.

Defendant insists that this decree should be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. George v. Wyandotte Electric Light Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Wilmarth v. WoodcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. F. H. Wolf Brick Co. v. LonyoMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Wilmarth v. WoodcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Campbell v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Hasselbring v. KoepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. City of Detroit v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Wasatch Oil Refining Co. v. Wade, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API