Legal Opinion

Opinion No. 78-256 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided December 28, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

CONTRACTS Clauses whereby the State agrees to pay taxes assessed against a private entity, or to reimburse that entity for taxes lawfully paid in connection with a contract between the State and that entity are inconsistent with the laws of the State of Oklahoma and thus void. Clauses whereby the State agrees to hold a private entity or individual harmless for his actions are inconsistent with the laws of the State of Oklahoma and thus void. Clauses whereby the State authorized a private entity to act as agent for the State are void unless specifically authorized by statute. Clauses whereby…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. Professional Practices CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Schrom Ex Rel. Schrom v. Oklahoma Industrial DevelopmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Rountree v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Board of Equalization v. Tulsa Pythian Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API