Legal Opinion
Zinser v. Rose
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 15, 1993No. 3-92-0315PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry
Plaintiffs are 13 chiropractors. Defendants are a chiropractic claims review service, Professional Evaluation Service, P.C. (PES), and its principals, Melvin Rose and Herbert Hender, and State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, a client of PES. Plaintiffs brought suit alleging sham reviews by PES of claims submitted to State Farm by plaintiffs’ patients. In their second amended complaint, plaintiffs sought recovery under theories alleging interference with contract and violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (111. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 121V2, par. 261 et…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Siegel v. Levy Organization Development Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- People Ex Rel. Daley v. Datacom Systems Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Zimmerman v. Northfield Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- L.S. Heath & Son, Inc. v. At & T Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Washington Courte Condominium Association-Four v. WASHINGTON-GOLF CORPORATIONAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Celex Group, Inc. v. Executive Gallery, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Lefebvre Intergraphics, Inc. v. Sanden MacHine Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Bank One Milwaukee v. SanchezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.